Very happy to announce that this HBR article has reached the top three most read ones of the month of October – appreciate if you can share it with your colleagues!

It is Time to End the Battle Between Waterfall and Agile

For the last two decades, too many academics, leaders, project managers, and organizations have thought they have to choose one or the other. Worse, the emergence of Agile methods led to tribalism in the project community, stifling innovation and limiting the potential for truly effective solutions.

Embracing hybrid methods can help organizations begin to remedy some of these outcomes. In this article, we look at how, with this blended approach, organizations can achieve an optimal balance, allowing them to nimbly adapt to unforeseen challenges without losing sight of their ultimate objectives.

The Limitations of Waterfall and Agile

While both Waterfall and Agile have their strengths, they also have their limitations.

  • Waterfall: Rigidity: Waterfall can be inflexible and slow to adapt to change.Late discovery of issues: Waterfall’s sequential nature can lead to the discovery of critical issues late in the project, when it is more expensive and time-consuming to fix them.Incompatibility with change:  Waterfall is not well-suited for projects with dynamic requirements.
  • Agile: Inadequate documentation: Agile’s focus on rapid delivery can lead to insufficient documentation.Unpredictable delivery time and costs: Agile can be challenging to estimate delivery times and costs, especially for complex projects.Dependence on client involvement: Agile projects require significant client involvement, which may not be possible in all cases.Inadequacy for certain types of projects: Agile is not well-suited for projects with fixed requirements or requiring high predictability.


Strategy implementation Playbook
HBR Book
project revolution
lead successful projects
The Focused Organization
In addition to the five books he has authored, Antonio has contributed to seven other business books.

The Case for Hybrid Project Management

Hybrid project management methodologies combine the planning rigor of Waterfall with the flexibility of Agile. This allows organizations to tailor the project approach to the specific needs of the project, considering factors such as the complexity of the project, the level of uncertainty, and the need for customer involvement.

Here are some of the benefits of using hybrid project management methodologies:

  • Increased flexibility
  • Reduced risk
  • Improved communication and collaboration
  • Enhanced efficiency and productivity
  • Higher customer satisfaction

Hybrid project management methodologies offer a number of benefits over traditional Waterfall and Agile approaches. By combining the strengths of both Waterfall and Agile, hybrid methods allow organizations to achieve an optimal balance between flexibility and predictability.

You’ll be able to read the full article here.

Looking forward to hearing your views on this critical topic!

More to come on Hybrid Project Management in future newsletters and posts.

See more on Linkedin

Subscribe on LinkedIn

Share this article!

HBR Project Management
HBR Project Management Handbook

The one primer you need to launch, lead, and sponsor successful projects.

by Antonio Nieto Rodriguez

Join 60,000+ subscribers in keeping up to date with the latest trends and best practices in project management and strategy implementation.


Leave A Comment